CheckoryCheckory
Clause 14.2 publicity paragraph with logo grant and case-study boxed, signing-day press and five-day deemed yes marked, no people

How to Review Publicity, Logo, and Case-Study Rights Before You Sign

Review a vendor publicity grant: list name, logo, photo, quote and ads, split press from a list tick, clock the case study, then consent, list-only, or delete.

9 min readArticle
💡

Key takeaway in 30 seconds

A publicity grant is a licence of your mark, not stationery. List name, logo, photo, quote, and ads instead of “marketing materials.” Split a signing-day press release from a quiet customer-list tick. Put a real approval clock on any case-study duty — no five-day deemed yes. Force confidentiality or publicity to yield. Write take-down days after exit. how to review publicity logo press-release and case-study rights — then pick consent, list-only, or delete.

A founder of a 16-person UK marketplace is about to sign a vendor MSA — a master services agreement the vendor hangs order forms on — because sales said “standard logo use.” She treats the heading as stationery. Reviewing those grants means you list each one, split press from a list tick, clock any case-study duty, then pick consent, list-only, or delete.

In September 2026, Oona — Founder of that marketplace — has Finance’s yes on a seller-disputes SaaS at £3,900 a month. Clause 14.2 lets the supplier issue a press release on the Effective Date and use her name, logo, photographs, and quotes in marketing materials, advertisements, and case studies. She must sit for one written case study within ninety days. Five silent business days equal a yes.

Clause 9.1 still says the existence of the Agreement is Confidential Information. No take-down days. AE Slack: “Standard logo use — we’ll announce on signing day.” Go-live is Monday. Typical mistake: treating the heading as stationery — hidden risk, not a logo tick. ContractKen calls a publicity clause one of the most under-negotiated terms. Oona’s paper grants press on signing day and treats five silent days as a case-study yes — while clause 9 still calls the deal a secret.

Disclaimer: Checkory provides AI support, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for binding decisions.

What does a publicity grant actually cover — name, logo, photo, quote, or ads?

Write five ticks before you debate “logo use.” Name. Logo. Photo. Quote. Ads. If the paper says only “marketing materials,” write “bundled — not listed.” A logo sentence is a trade-mark licence, not stationery.

Freeze the packet — the exact file set that will be signed (MSA + order form + exhibits). Search publicity, press release, logo, case study, marketing materials, photograph, quote. Zuva splits name vs logo vs photos. Sprintlaw UK : a licence is not an assignment; goodwill accrues to the owner. An identifiable employee face or named quote is personal data; the ICO notes employer-employee consent is often the wrong basis. This is not a US right-of-publicity hunt. Do: list the five grants. Don’t: treat “standard logo use” as the list.

Table listing five publicity grants: name, logo, photo, quote, and ads, with a bundled-not-listed row
Table listing five publicity grants: name, logo, photo, quote, and ads, with a bundled-not-listed row

Typical mistake

Oona files 14.2 as stationery. The paper fires press on the Effective Date, swallows photos, quotes, and ads, and treats five silent days as a yes.

How do you split a press release from a quiet customer-list tick?

Circle whether they may issue a press release on the Effective Date, or only add a factual name — and maybe a logo — to a website list. A Newswire post cannot be un-sent. A list tick can be withdrawn.

For example, TeamMaven MSA 2026.1 may use name and logo to identify a user, and will not publish a case study or quote without prior written consent. Oona’s 14.2 is the other pole: press on the Effective Date. FCA DTR / UK MAR colour is listed-issuer only. Do: circle press vs list. Don’t: accept signing-day Newswire as “logo on the website.”

Checklist splitting signing-day press from a withdrawable customer-list tick
Checklist splitting signing-day press from a withdrawable customer-list tick

When is a case-study duty not a veto?

A duty to participate plus a five-day deemed yes is not a veto. Write who drafts, who must appear, how many business days to approve, and whether silence is deemed approval. “Not unreasonably withheld” without a real clock is a fight, not a stop.

In England and Wales, Lewis Silkin (29 May 2024) : the party alleging unreasonableness bears the burden; if consent was unreasonably withheld, the other side may treat it as no longer required. Oona’s five-day deemed yes skips that fight and publishes. Prefer prior written consent in her sole discretion, a named reviewer, no deemed yes. Do: refuse deemed approval. Don’t: treat “not unreasonably withheld” as a real veto.

Workflow of a 90-day case-study duty with a five-day deemed-yes clock and prior written consent
Workflow of a 90-day case-study duty with a five-day deemed-yes clock and prior written consent

Why must confidentiality or publicity yield on signing day?

If clause 9 says the existence of the Agreement is confidential and clause 14 says announce on the Effective Date, one must yield. Write which sentence wins on Monday. Confidentiality drafted for trade secrets does not stop a press grant you already signed.

ContractKen’s split: confidentiality protects substance; publicity controls talking about the relationship. Required-by-law carve-outs are listed-issuer colour — not a 16-person marketplace duty. In practice, a LinkedIn post is already an announcement. Do: mark which sentence wins. Don’t: assume “confidentiality already covers this.”

How many take-down days do you write after exit?

Write numbered days after exit and after a written withdraw. “Reasonable time” leaves the mark on the homepage and in cached ads. Circle website, digital decks, paid ads, and print. Silence is not a date.

On take-down, MarkedUp colour: remove from the website and digital collateral within ten business days — a pattern, not a statute. TeamMaven only says “reasonable time.” fynk (9 June 2026) drafts an immediate stop — again a specimen. If you later become a competitor, the licence should die on exit and on written notice even during the term. Do: write days for site, decks, and paid ads. Don’t: assume they will take the logo down.

Workflow

list each grant → press vs list → case-study clock → confidentiality or publicity yields → take-down days → consent / list-only / delete

Spend counsel — a qualified solicitor, not a chatbot — on signing-day press, a deemed case-study, or no take-down. Pick one path. Do not mark the paper ready for signature. “It’s just a logo on their website” is not the pause sentence if 14.2 also fires a press release on the Effective Date.

Consent: prior written, sole discretion, named channels, no ads, no photo or quote unless separately cleared, no deemed yes, take-down in numbered days. List-only: factual name on a customer list, withdraw anytime, no press, no case study. Delete: strike 14.2; confidentiality wins. An exhibit — an attached brand-guidelines schedule — pins visual rules; it does not replace the grant list.

Success bar before you sign: fill the one-page log — packet, five grants, press or list, case-study duty plus clock plus deemed, whether existence is secret, take-down days, then consent / list-only / delete — and point to one sentence that would pause Monday.

If the fight is a website Accept tick, that is a different hunt — the website terms-of-service review. If the fight is auto-renew, export, or the liability cap, open the SaaS red-flags checklist. Optional after the human hunt: a Checkory first-pass — a first machine pass that extracts clauses before a human reads every page — on the same PDF. A human opens every High flag — a high-severity hit a human must verify.

Bundled grant vs a list-only tick

PaperPressCase studyTake-down
Oona 14.2 + 9.1Effective Date Newswire90-day duty + 5-day deemed yesSilent
List-only tickName on a website listNoneNumbered days + withdraw

Seven steps on the grant

1

Freeze the packet

MSA plus order form plus any brand-guidelines exhibit. Search publicity, press release, logo, case study.

2

List five grants

Name / logo / photo / quote / ads. If the paper says only “marketing materials,” write “bundled — not listed.”

3

Split press from list

Circle Effective Date press versus a factual customer-list tick. A Newswire post cannot be un-sent.

4

Write the case-study clock

Who drafts, who appears, how many business days, deemed yes or not. Refuse a 5-day deemed approval.

5

Force one sentence to yield

If existence is confidential and publicity says announce on signing day, mark which sentence wins.

6

Write take-down days

Website, decks, paid ads. Numbered days after exit and after written notice.

7

Consent, list-only, or delete

Prior written sole-discretion consent, a list-only tick, or strike the grant.

Frequently asked questions

Can they announce the deal on signing day?
Only if this paper says so and confidentiality yields. Oona’s clause 14.2 does — press on the Effective Date — while clause 9.1 still calls the deal a secret.
Does a logo grant include ads?
Not unless the paper says advertisements or “marketing materials” swallows ads. Oona’s 14.2 lists advertisements. Tick ads as its own grant.
What if we later become a competitor?
The licence should die on exit and on written notice. Do not leave a surviving case-study or logo right.
Is “consent not unreasonably withheld” a real case-study veto?
No, not with a five-day deemed yes. In England and Wales, if they later call a “no” unreasonable they may treat consent as unused.
How fast must they remove the logo after we leave?
Only as fast as the numbered days you write. “Reasonable time” is not a date. Write days for website, decks, and paid ads.
Does ticking the MSA count as employee photo consent?
No. An identifiable employee face or a named quote is personal data. The MSA grant is not that person’s UK GDPR consent.

Highlight the publicity grant on the file

Upload the same PDF. A human still opens the Effective Date sentence.

Start document analysis

What to do next

Sources

Related guides